Search for: "Mr. Stocker"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2017, 3:17 am
Mrs Stocker engaged in a Facebook conversation with Deborah Bligh, Mr Stocker’s current partner, which was also visible to Ms Bligh’s Facebook Friends. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 2:31 am
An ordinary reader of the post would have interpreted the post as meaning that Mr Stocker had grasped Mrs Stocker by the throat and applied force to her neck. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 4:07 pm
Mrs Stocker said that the March 2003 incident was triggered by Mr Stocker being pricked with a pin while he stood on a chair as she shortened the hem of his trousers. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Mr Stocker sued for defamation. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
Mr Stocker sued for defamation, alleging that Mrs Stocker’s words would be understood to mean that he had tried to kill Mrs Stocker by strangulation (which, Mr Stocker said, was untrue and defamatory). [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Mr Stocker sued for defamation. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
Mr. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 10:00 pm
Mr Justice Warby in Stocker v Stocker [2015] EWHC 1634 at paragraph 63: “Witness statements are meant to be in the witness’s own words, and an assistant solicitor should be able to do the majority of the work” [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 10:02 pm
It has been suggested that in the case of Stocker v Stocker [2015] EWHC 1634 the most interesting observation by Mr Justice Warby was: “I readily acknowledge the importance of ensuring that the costs budgeting process does not result in … Continue reading → [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
Court of Appeal Mrs Stocker appealed. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 4:12 am
Stocker was the first non-Japanese president of the company. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the libel appeal of Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17). [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:45 pm
A welcome move away from the reasoning in Stocker v Stocker, in which the High Court and Court of Appeal held (before being overturned by the Supreme Court) that a woman had defamed her ex-husband in saying he tried to strangle her when it “was beyond dispute” that he had grasped her by the throat so tightly as to leave red marks on her neck visible to police officers two hours later. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm
I believe that my reasoning is in line with those observations of Mr. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
Facebook has also agreed to pay Mr Lewis’ legal costs. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
Stocker v Stocker, heard 7 May 2015 (Warby J). [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
A good example of this is Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17; [2018] EWCA Civ 170; [2016] EWHC 474 (QB) in which the meaning of five words “he tried to strangle me” went all the way on appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
On Tuesday 1 July 2014 he heard mitigation on behalf on Mr Coulson. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm
In the Courts On Monday 16 June 2014, HHJ Parkes QC heard an application in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm
The biggest media legal story of the week was the Mirror Phone Hacking judgment handed down by Mr Justice Mann on 21 May 2015. [read post]
